Why This Problem Is Becoming More Common

Industrial control systems are expected to operate reliably for many years, but the engineering environment surrounding them has changed significantly.

​

Several industry trends are making automation systems increasingly difficult to support:

​

• Experienced automation engineers are retiring, taking decades of specialist knowledge with them.

• Legacy PLCs and control systems remain in service well beyond their original design life.

• Budget pressures delay planned upgrades, increasing reliance on ageing equipment.

• Industrial control systems are becoming more complex, integrating PLCs, SCADA, HMIs, Building Management Systems and connected devices.

• Facilities teams are expected to manage automation systems despite often having limited in-house automation expertise.

• Multiple automation support services are frequently used across different sites, leading to inconsistent engineering standards and documentation.

​

Many facilities also operate control panels that have evolved over many years through modifications completed by different contractors, maintenance teams and control panel fabricators. Without consistent engineering standards and accurate documentation, even routine maintenance becomes increasingly difficult. When replacement panels are eventually required, organisations often discover there is insufficient information available to support efficient control panel manufacturing or future upgrades.

​

Without a clear long-term support strategy, routine maintenance becomes reactive, fault diagnosis becomes slower and every failure becomes more difficult and expensive to resolve.

The Warning Signs

If several of the following statements apply to your site, your automation systems may be becoming increasingly difficult to support.

​

Control System Health Check

□ Every automation contractor provides different recommendations.

□ Nobody has a complete understanding of how the control system operates.

□ PLC software backups cannot be located or have never been verified.

□ Electrical drawings are outdated or incomplete.

□ PLC software versions are unknown.

□ Faults take longer to diagnose than they used to.

□ Emergency call-outs are becoming more frequent.

□ Support depends heavily on one individual or contractor.

□ Control panels have been modified without documentation updates.

□ SCADA or HMI systems contain outdated graphics or alarms.

□ Spare parts availability is becoming a concern.

□ There is no formal lifecycle or upgrade plan.

​

If you recognised several of these warning signs, your organisation may benefit from a structured review of its automation systems before small issues develop into major operational problems.

Why Multiple Contractors Often Increase Risk

Many organisations assume that using several contractors reduces risk because there are more engineers available to provide support.

​

In reality, the opposite is often true.

​

Different contractors typically use different PLC programming standards, naming conventions, documentation formats and engineering practices. Over time, each modification makes the system slightly different from the original design.

​

This often results in:

​

Different programming standards

↓

Different documentation formats

↓

Different control panel modifications

↓

No clear engineering ownership

↓

Longer fault diagnosis

↓

Higher maintenance costs

↓

Reduced control system reliability

​

Without standardisation, every contractor spends valuable time understanding previous work before solving the current problem. Knowledge becomes fragmented and no one has complete ownership of the automation system.